Teaching

Teaching strategy as a way of thinking, and rethinking that task in the age of AI

I have been teaching strategy for almost 20 years, at Michigan since 2011 and at INSEAD before that. The classroom is where I keep learning which strategy ideas endure, which ones travel well, and which questions need to be asked again because AI has changed the setting.

My basic view is simple: strategy is a way of seeing, not a stockpile of answers. A good course should leave students thinking more clearly about competition, uncertainty, and organizational choice, not just better able to fill in a framework.

Courses

MBA and Executive Programs

The AI & Strategy syllabus and a recent MBA strategy syllabus give a sense of the questions, cases, and tools I use.

Doctoral Teaching

Syllabi are available here for the Doctoral Seminar in Strategy and Models of Organizational Cognition.

What I Try to Do in the Classroom

Does the Strategy Course Work?

With Mana Heshmati, I studied what happens when MBA students take a core strategy course. In Learning strategic representations, we examined 2,269 MBA students before and after the course and found measurable improvements in decision-making, deeper mental representations, broader attention to industry and competitive dynamics, and a useful combination of greater confidence and greater awareness of uncertainty.

That paper matters to me because it treats teaching as something worth studying seriously, not just doing. A related paper, The effects of artificial intelligence on management education, asks how business schools should change when AI begins to match performance on many of the analytical tasks they teach.

Teaching Materials and Recognition

Doctoral Advising

I advise PhD students and serve on doctoral committees in strategy and organization theory. Former students I have advised or co-advised have placed at Washington Foster, UT Austin McCombs, Bocconi, and Wharton. If your interests overlap with the work on the Research page, feel free to write.